Print-friendly version
Send this to a friend
Posted 3/15/2004
Contrarian Chronicles
About Contrarian Chronicles
Learn the Contrarian Chronicles lingo
Subscribe to Market Rap on Fleckenstein Capital
Related Resources
See what the market sectors are doing
Check todays currency rates
Look up the best performing industries
What sectors are in and out of favor?
Contrarian Chronicles
Recent articles:
• Don't tell MAMA, but tech is misbehaving, 3/8/2004
• Don't take mortgage advice from Alan Greenspan, 3/1/2004
• The sliding dollar is already costing you, 2/23/2004
More...
| | Contrarian Chronicles
The jobs picture is even worse than it seems
The closer you look at the numbers, the more you realize unemployment is higher than the headlines tell you. And despite what the experts say, inflation is out there, and were feeling it already.
By Bill Fleckenstein
Given my contention over the last year that our economic "recovery" would not be self-sustaining -- because it would be incapable of generating jobs -- I'd like to spend a minute on the February employment report.
This report, released March 5, is the third consecutive employment report that has disappointed nearly everyone. And it puts an exclamation point behind the idea that we are not creating jobs in this country.
A look under the hood is not pretty
In fact, if you take a peek beneath the surface of the employment report, it's far worse than the headline number. (The supporting data are available here.)
Using the seasonally adjusted total unemployment rate of 5.6% and adding to it "discouraged" workers, the rate grows to 5.9%. Factor in other groups of people who are underutilized in the work force, you can ratchet the number all the way up to 9.6%. And, for the sake of comprehensiveness, if you use the non-seasonally adjusted numbers, that rate would swell to 10.9%. So, those are the numbers, and I'll leave readers to draw their own conclusions.
| The larger view of unemployment | | Category | % of civilian work force | | Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer. | 2.2% | | Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs. | 3.0 | | Total unemployed. (Official unemployment rate) | 5.6 | | Total unemployed plus discouraged workers. | 5.9 | | Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other marginally attached workers. | 6.7 | | Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part-time for economic reasons, plus all marginally attached workers | 9.6 |
|
Marginally attached workers are neither working nor looking for work. But they want to work and have looked for jobs.
Discouraged workers have given up looking for jobs.
Workers employed part-time for economic reasons want full-time jobs but have to settle for part-time.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics employment situation report for February
The inescapable conclusions for me, therefore, are: - True unemployment in this country is not 5.6% but something a fair bit higher.
- There are many people who are under-employed.
- Theres a big block of people who have given up.
What's particularly scary is how pathetic job growth has been, despite all the interest-rate cuts (nominal rates are near zero, and real rates are essentially below zero), the two Bush tax cuts and now the refunds from the last cut. Despite it all, we still can't get enough jobs created.
Of course, we're not creating jobs, not just because of outsourcing (which is an issue) but due to the real problem -- the core of what's behind much of our troubles today. Thats the misallocation of capital that occurred in the late 1990s mania, and the response to it. That has created wild times in housing and drunkenness in borrowing.
Related news and commentary on MSN Money
The Fed's inflation awareness: running on empty
Speaking of the body that's landed us in this predicament, it is remarkable to watch the Federal Reserve governors still fret about deflation. I guess they haven't pulled up to the gas pump lately on their way to work. Or read this recent Wall Street Journal story, "Companies Fight Rising Steel Prices." It illustrates how a declining currency winds up costing you money in ways that may surprise you.
As a lead-in to the story, let me state the obvious: While America's central bankers discuss falling prices, America's consumers are dealing with exactly the opposite problem. Apparently, the "experts" have forgotten that it takes a while for price increases to penetrate the inflation indices in a major way. Prices are already up in many areas, and this only portends more inflation in the immediate future.
Now to share a few useful observations from the article, in the name of provoking thought: "Indeed, a handful of companies -- among them makers of mattresses and gym equipment -- already have or are preparing to ask shoppers to pay more to cover their rising steel costs. But most other manufacturers are trying to push steel-price jumps of up to 30% to 50% to other companies along the supply chain, creating tension between steel producers, their biggest customers and numerous smaller suppliers between them."
The story notes that a declining currency (the real culprit) takes money out of your wallet, even if you don't buy high-end European goods: "With the weak dollar discouraging imported steel, steelmakers have successfully passed on price increases to many of their customers."
And that's how it works. This is a global environment, as everyone is so fond of saying. When foreigners' prices go up, domestic manufacturers can raise their prices, just like the steel companies are doing.
It's been a long time since we've had to grapple with any serious inflation problems. Mostly, we've seen garden-variety 3% to 4% inflation, though the government and the Fed claim it's been less. It sure feels higher than that. I don't pretend to know exactly what the real rate is, but it's not the government's headline number. In any case, while some middlemen have absorbed price hikes, as the Journal story notes, it's important to understand that going forward, we'll see less absorbed and more passed on to us.
For wine, a loftier price sticker
To cite just one example of how the process works, I'd like to share an e-mail from someone I know in the restaurant business who buys wine for a decent-sized chain. (He was responding to my Feb. 23 Contrarian Chronicles column, in which I said that due to the declining dollar, we would see a price hike for wine.)
I have met with all of my suppliers, and you are right on. The middleman took up the euro slack for quite a while, but all of my prices are going up 6% to 15%, and I am in the process of passing this on to the guest, via menu-price increase. The distributors are tacking more on the high-end wines, trying to keep the value wines cheap to move the volume (glut) of juice. For the restaurant business, there is more. This does not include the impact of inflation-indexed minimum wage in Washington State (servers make $20 per hour easily with tips), or any imported food from Europe, i.e., cheese and meats that also are going up in price.
Saying goodbye to an old friend for now
Finally, a housekeeping note: Recently, I decided to sell my Annaly Mortgage Management (NLY, news, msgs) stock. Let me be clear: This is not because of anything at Annaly Mortgage. I still think the people in charge are absolutely terrific. To the extent that I want to have my money managed in the fixed-income arena, they're the people I want to do it.
I am, however, increasingly concerned about the collateral behind the real estate market. As chronicled on my Web site's "Housing Hot Potato" series, there are a lot of people who have taken on a lot of debt who maybe shouldn't have. I am just shocked at the aggressive trolling that finance companies are doing to try to get people to take out money against their houses, or to buy houses. I think the credit structure in this country is as bad as it's ever been -- by some huge factor. That, of course, doesn't mean that something bad is about to happen. But if something bad does happen, it could get really ugly, and fast.
If things get bad (and I dont know if they will get bad), I don't believe that the mortgage debt backed by Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs) and Freddie Mac (FRE, news, msgs) will be welched on. Rather, I believe the government will step up and make it all good. If my concerns are valid, there will be questions at some point about the value of the paper that's collateralized by real estate. I fear that in such an environment, Annaly stock might get beaten up.
If I am wrong, Ill forfeit the chance to keep getting that nice, fat dividend and any appreciation from here. But I am willing to accept that risk. I am not advocating that anyone else do as I have done, and I might change my mind about this decision later.
Again, this is in no way a reflection of anything that I know that is going on at Annaly. It is just a macro concern of mine that anything associated with the real estate market could come in for a drubbing down the road, especially something that has a fair amount of leverage associated with it.
Bill Fleckenstein is president of Fleckenstein Capital, which manages a hedge fund based in Seattle. He also writes a daily Market Rap column on his Fleckensteincapital.com site. His investment positions can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. At the time of publication, he did not own or control any of the equities mentioned in this column. The views and opinions expressed in Bill Fleckenstein's columns are his own and not necessarily those of MSN Money.
|
