Jon Markman

Print-friendly version
Send this to a friend

Posted 4/10/2002


SuperModels Community

Join the discussion in the MSN Money SuperModels Community.




















EDS
Price9.260
Change+0.280
Research Wizard

Add to MSN Stock List

Message Board






IBM
Price123.490
Change+0.940
Research Wizard

Add to MSN Stock List

Message Board






CSC
Price52.600
Change-0.100
Research Wizard

Add to MSN Stock List

Message Board






BMY
Price22.640
Change+0.140
Research Wizard

Add to MSN Stock List

Message Board





GM
Price0.750
Changeunch
Research Wizard

Add to MSN Stock List

Message Board



 SuperModels
EDS: Buy or bye-bye?

advertisement
Armed with evidence of declining earnings quality and aggressive bookkeeping, Wall Street fingers an unusual suspect: EDS. Should you steer clear, or is this an opportunity created by Enron-induced hypersensitivity?

By Jon D. Markman

Not too long ago, Wall Street applauded companies that grew faster than their peers. Now it places them under suspicion. In the case of Electronic Data Systems (EDS, news, msgs), an information technology giant accused of deteriorating earnings quality and business conditions, the market equivalent of house arrest might well come next.

New studies by two independent and two brokerage-based researchers raise concerns about EDS on three fronts: It faces increased risks that 2002 revenue and earnings could fall short of promises because of lackluster growth in new contracts; a wide-ranging reorganization announced Friday brings new operational risks; and it has allegedly taken advantage of gray areas in accounting rules to make income and cash-flow growth appear more electric than a less-aggressive approach would permit.
See the news
that affects your stocks.

Check out our
new News center.



The EDS financial story is cross-eyed complicated but worth examining. Its travails are emblematic of firms that grew huge by feeding the appetite among governments and industry for outsourcing -- the practice of taking on data-crunching, transaction-processing and other services that are outside an organizations core competency. As the yen for these projects began to moderate during the recession, EDS and others, like IBM (IBM, news, msgs) and Computer Sciences (CSC, news, msgs), faced the prospect of negligible growth in bookings from old and new customers alike, as well as a fall-off in pricing power.

Investors have already taken note of these issues and hammered the stock down 30% in the past five months, driving it to $51 on Monday from its November high at $72. Shares now trade at a paltry forward price-to-earnings multiple of 15 -- a level that Merrill Lynch, in a report on Friday, called as low as it has ever sunk historically.

That makes the company a poster child for the problem with todays large-cap technology stocks: If you believe the information economy has troughed, its time to take advantage of the palpable panic and start nibbling on EDS shares. Yet the company is still vulnerable to the sort of body blows suffered by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY, news, msgs) last week or IBM this week when each confirmed widely held fears by steering estimates downward under similar pressure.

To be sure, EDS -- spun out of General Motors (GM, news, msgs) in 1996 -- is still a powerhouse in its industry. New management initiated a turnaround in 1999 and reaped rewards by sailing through 2001 without lowering guidance as tech companies elsewhere were crushed. In just the past few months, it has announced multimillion-dollar deals with the British post office, the Dutch bank ABM Amro (ABN, news, msgs), electronics maker Emerson (EMR, news, msgs), the governments of Pennsylvania and Kansas, and many more. And on Friday it announced plans to go after the multibillion-dollar technology consulting business abandoned by Big 5 accounting firms such as Arthur Andersen.

But even when you add up all the new business, says Rod Bourgeois, an analyst at the independent research firm Sanford C. Bernstein, it looks as if EDS is headed for the sort of stumble that took its shares down 24% in one day back in June 2000, in the early days of the companys comeback. Although hes still an ardent bull on its long-term prospects and would buy on a wipeout, he says investors should have concerns about EDS ability to meet guidance in the first half of 2002.

So should you stay away, or get involved? Lets take a closer look.

When earnings growth outpaces cash flow
Camelback Research Alliance, an independent company that created the StockScouter system at MSN Money, says investors should have seen this coming when EDS issued its fourth-quarter earnings report and 2001 annual report earlier in this year. Camelback provides research on earnings quality to institutional clients and raised a red flag when it noticed that while EDS cash flow appeared to rise in 2001 versus 2000, it would have fallen if not for a tax bill that came in $327 million lower than the prior year. Additionally, Camelback noted that cash flow has been steadily declining over the past five years -- from $2.2 billion in 1997 to $1.7 billion in 2001 -- at the same time that earnings have been reported as rising from $730 million in 1997 to $1.36 billion in 2001.

Camelbacks analysis of historic earnings-quality trends across the market has led it to the belief that when income growth exceeds cash-flow growth over long periods, investors should be concerned, because it is much easier for companies to fudge earnings figures than cash-flow figures. Camelback believes that once the quality of a companys earnings and cash-flow stream begins to deteriorate, its stock usually declines over the following 12 to 24 months as investors question their assumptions. In this case, an EDS spokesman said cash flow would pick up the pace in coming years as payments from new contract signings kick in.

Theres more to the story than cash-flow trends, however. Donn Vickrey, vice president at Camelback, notes that while EDS fourth-quarter report shows the company recorded revenue up 12% and income up 19% year over year, much of the difference came from an $814 million increase in what accountants call unbilled revenues, and, to a lesser extent, restructuring charge reversals.

The Twilight Zone of accounting
Why is this a big deal? For that, we need to wade into the accounting Twilight Zone. Unbilled revenues represent receipts from long-term consulting contracts that have not been billed to the customer by year's end. When a company books unbilled revenues under percentage of completion accounting rules, it is declaring that a portion of contracted services is complete and that it expects the money to be collected later.

Now, its important to note that there are at least three categories of dollars that can be booked as revenue. The best is cash -- e.g., Company X sells a service to Company Y and receives a check. The next best is accounts receivable -- e.g., Company X sells a service to Company Y, and books the value of a credit while awaiting the check. Third best is unbilled revenues -- e.g., Company X sells a service to Company Y, then books the value of the deal before even asking for the check.

Accounting for these unbilled revenues is somewhat subjective. Much of EDS unbilled revenues in 2001 stem from a contract with the U.S. Navy to build a 400,000-seat intranet site. Under the terms of the deal, EDS must pay for all the construction costs up front; it doesnt get a dime from the Navy until the system goes into testing and operation. To match revenues with these costs, companies are permitted under accounting rules to estimate the costs and profits of the deal, and book them as if they had already been billed and received, rather than simply promised. While the fixed costs are rarely in dispute, the profit is an educated guess and could be disputed by the client many years later when actually billed. Additionally, companies might ultimately have a hard time actually collecting on the contract if their client runs into financial trouble. While thats not a concern with the U.S. Navy, it could be a problem with other clients. An EDS spokesman says that the firm has booked only costs, not profit, in the Navy deal so far.

In addition to its concerns strictly on the numbers, Camelback doesnt like the fact that EDS auditor, KPMG, receives almost twice as much for non-audit services as it does for auditing: $9.4 million versus $4.8 million, potentially providing motivation for KPMG to accept aggressive accounting methods more readily. Plus, insider trading is overwhelming on the sell side. The only insider purchase reported over the last two years was Frederick Douglas, who purchased 500 shares at $42.56 in July 2000; yet there have been around 140,000 insider shares sold since that date at prices ranging from $57.62 to $70.98. Also, EDS debt-to-equity multiple is moderately higher than rivals IBM and Computer Sciences. And finally, brokerage RBC Capital Markets, among others, notes that the corporate reorganization announced Friday brings increased management execution risk at a difficult time.

The brighter side
The good news? EDS has an impressive board of directors comprised of experienced executives outside the company, including James A. Baker III, former White House chief of staff; Roger Enrico, former chairman of Pepsi; and C. Robert Kidder, chairman of Borden. The boards audit committee is also strong and independent. There is no evidence of questionable related-party transactions, as there were at Enron. And EDS debt ratings are strong.

Considering that EDS shares have already fallen 20% since Bourgeois at Sanford Bernstein issued his downgrade in mid-March, and by a third since their November peak, its possible that investors have already accounted for all of the negative issues in the current price. But history shows that if and when a company confirms suspicions, there is room for further downside. The company has almost two weeks in which it could issue new guidance before earnings are announced on April 22.

The bottom line: EDS has a powerful franchise in a growing field, and its fallen price has brought expectations closer in line with economic reality. When big companies with reasonably decent balance sheets fall to five-year P/E lows, value-oriented investors with a two-year horizon unafraid of considerable risk should take notice. I will add a half position of EDS shares to the Supermodels portfolio if shares fall to $45 or less; stop loss at $37.

Fine Print

Ducommun (DCO, news, msgs), the small-cap defense contractor commended for your consideration on March 20 (Stocks on the warpath, and not for the first time), has risen a lot faster than expected. In part because of an announcement of a new three-year contract with Boeing (BA, news, msgs) to build wing spoiler assemblies on new 737 aircraft, shares are up 46% in the past three weeks. . . . Regis (RGIS, news, msgs), the leading hair-salon owner and franchisor highlighted in my column April 3, (Why wait for a panic? 20 stocks to buy now) said Friday that sales in its U.S. salons open at least one year rose a better-than-expected 5.1% in March because of strong results in the week preceding Easter. . . . My last column about earnings quality, on Feb. 20, raised questions about Anadarko Petroleum (APC, news, msgs). So far, the company has outperformed both the broad market and its industry by advancing 12%. But earnings quality tends to have a lagged, 12- to 24-month effect, according to Camelback, so theres still plenty of time to wait to see if EQ issues will hit the stock. . . . And speaking of time lags, Ive been patiently waiting for a long-short portfolio that I created based on StockScouter ratings on Sept. 26 to work out. This was initially one of the worst portfolios that I created in 2001, as my 10 shorts shot up pretty quickly in the post-terror rally and my 10 longs dawdled. The portfolio was oriented toward a six- to 12-month hold, however, and with the smash-up of networking stocks recently, it is finally getting close to beating the S&P 500 ($INX): The 20-stock list has returned 10.1% since inception through April 5, versus 10.4% for the S&P 500. Best long: Air Products & Chemicals (APD, news, msgs), up 38%.

At the time of publication, Jon Markman did not own or control shares of any of the equities or funds mentioned in this column.

 

More Resources
· E-mail us your comments on this article
· Post on the SuperModels message board
· Get a daily dose of market news
· Sign up to receive an alert when we publish Jon's next article
advertisement

Sponsored Links

  • StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
  • MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.