Jeff Schnepper
 
Print-friendly version
Send this to a friend

 
Cool Tools
Get market news by e-mail
See if refinancing works
Personal finance bookshelf
Letters from MSN Money readers
Find It!
Article Index
Fast Answers
Tools Index
Site map
MSN Money




Recent articles by Jeff Schnepper:
• IRS helps disabled hold on to financial health,
10/30/2004

• No more free rides on car donations, SUVs,
10/26/2004

• Hey Jeff, who pays the tax on a $60,000 gift?,
10/5/2004

More...



Related Sites


Read the "Taxpayer bill of rights" here

Internal Revenue Service

IRS Tax Information for Innocent Spouses

IRS questions and answers on innocent spouse relief

 
The Basics
Don't let a cheatin' spouse stick you with the tax bill

advertisement
Congress made it easier to claim you didn't know the tax problems your spouse was creating. But to get off the hook, make sure you really didn't know anything.

 By Jeff Schnepper

It used to be that, if your spouse ran off and left you with a ton of tax problems that you never knew about, you were financial toast.

The Internal Revenue Service could come after you for any money owed while you were married to the oaf and make you pay. The U.S. Supreme Court held in 1999, for example, that New Yorker Elizabeth Cockrell was liable for a $650,000 tax bill generated in the early 1980s by her former husband, a tax-shelter promoter and commodities trader.

Congress tried to remedy the problem in a 1998 tax bill. It allowed spouses who had no clue they faced a tax bill to seek relief. Relief is often granted, if not in all cases. The facts have to be just right, and you should be prepared for the process to take time.

Joint return, joint problem
The tax concept at play is called joint and several liability. It means that if youre married and file a joint tax return, husband and wife are both responsible for any taxes due. The liability extends even after a divorce.

It is a strict concept, one the IRS defends strenuously and which the courts are rarely willing to let up on. In a Texas case, for example, a wife knew her husband had used a big retirement distribution to pay off a mortgage and buy a sport-utility vehicle. And she knew the distribution was taxable. She was held liable even though he had told her, fraudulently, that there was no tax problem.

It was in the context of disputes like these that Congress enacted innocent spouse relief. After passage in 1998 bill, the IRS was hit with far more claims than the 3,000 it originally expected. In fact, the agency received 45,000 in the first year alone. Since then, filings have come in at a rate of 600 to 1,000 a week. Since the law became effective through fiscal 2004, there have been 317,349 innocent spouse claims filed.

Here are the latest numbers:

 How the IRS deals with innocent spouse claims
Fiscal YearReceiptsFully allowedPartially AllowedDisallowedNonqualifying
200451,9989,7883,80419,84523,721
200351,8847,5503,59720,33224,604
200250,6168,7055,70518,24223,906
Source: Internal Revenue Service

Partially allowed is where the IRS allowed everything they could under the law. For example, even if you win you wont get a refund if the Statute of Limitations has run.

Nonqualifying is where the claim doesnt meet the basic requirements. For example, where no joint return has been filed and its not a community property issue.

You can qualify as an innocent spouse and be relieved from liability from a deficiency on a joint return if:
  • You did not know about the understatement of tax, and
  • You had no reason to know about the understatement of tax, and
  • It would be inequitable to hold you responsible for the deficiency.
The item at issue need not be grossly erroneous, nor does the understatement have to be substantial.

Innocent spouse relief may be provided on an apportioned basis. In that case, you may even be relieved of liability for a portion of the deficiency if you knew or had reason to know of other understatements of tax on your joint return.

You apply using Form 8857. You must apply within two years from the date the IRS begins collection actions.

Theres a special provision if you, at the time of the application, are no longer married to your joint filer -- or are legally separated, or have lived apart from him or her for at least 12 months.

In any of those cases, you can elect to limit your liability to the portion of the deficiency thats attributable directly to you. In simple terms, the IRS computes your returns as if you filed separately and applies your percentage of the total tax due to the actual deficiency.

Assume the deficiency is $100 on a disallowed deduction. And had you filed separately, youd have owed a total tax of $400 and your spouse a total tax of $600. The IRS can only go after you for 40% of whats owed, or $40.

Here's the catch
If you and your spouse fraudulently transfer assets between you, neither spouse is eligible for relief.

If the IRS proves that the electing spouse had actual knowledge of the item on the return thats found to be incorrect, then the election doesnt apply. But, the burden of proof here is on the IRS to establish actual knowledge.

Even if you dont qualify for innocent spouse relief or separation of liability, you may be eligible for equitable relief. To get equitable relief, it must be unfair to hold you liable for the underpayment or understatement of tax, taking into account all of the facts and circumstances.

If the IRS rejects your election as an innocent spouse, you can petition the Tax Court for judicial review. In that case, your spouse must be notified by the IRS and has 60 days to intervene and contest your petition.


More Resources
· E-mail us your comments on this article
· Post on the Your Money message board
· Get a daily dose of market news
advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.