 | |||||||||||
|
To print article, click Print on your browser's File menu. Go back | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Recent articles by Liz Pulliam Weston: • Don't bite off too much house, 1/25/2004 • When paying off debt is a bad idea, 1/19/2004 • 3 keys to defeating debt now, 1/11/2004 More... |
|||||||||||
|
Related Articles The tax cut taxpayers need most Related Resources Decision Center: Plan your dream retirement How long will your golden years last Related Sites Try out the ARRP Medicare Drug Benefit Calculator Why AARP supported the Medicare drug bill Details about the Medicare drug bill from the Social Security Administration |
|||||||||||
| The Basics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How Social Security cheats you to pay the rich | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Workers earning minimum wage pay their full share, while those who pull down a few hundred grand pay much, much less. How about a tax break for real people? By Liz Pulliam Weston What would you think of a tax system that took money from the poor to give to the rich? Thats essentially whats happening with our Social Security and Medicare tax system, where low-income workers are dunned to pay benefits for high-income seniors. Before the AARP strings me up for heresy, Ill quickly add that lots of folks paying into the system are better off than lots of folks who get money out of it. In fact, two-thirds of seniors rely on Social Security for more than half their income, and four out of 10 say it comprises more than 80%. Im also not saying theres anything wrong with drawing a Social Security check. You paid into the system, and youre getting what you were promised. But that doesnt change the fact that some guy making minimum wage with no health insurance has to pay 7.65% of every dollar he earns, while some seniors worth millions get checks and discounted health care. Thats Robin Hood in reverse. The rich really do get a deal on Social Security This is a reality that gets far too little attention, particularly when Congress is busy adding to the problem with a Medicare prescription drug benefit.
Ill make my biases clear: I work for a living, so I pay Social Security and Medicare taxes. But Im one of the lucky ones, in that my annual income is above $87,900. Thats the cutoff for having to pay Social Security taxes in 2004. (I still have to pay Medicare taxes above that amount, since that particular tax has no income limit.) Roughly 20% of households report incomes above that threshold, according to the Census Bureau. The total income of that 20% of families represents half of all U.S. income. So the proportion of my income that goes to Social Security and Medicare taxes is actually smaller than what most of America pays. The Social Security outlay for folks like me and Michael Eisner, the chairman of the Walt Disney Co., is capped at $5,449.80 this year. (He makes a wee bit more than I do, so well use him as an example.) This maximum contribution is about half of one percent of Eisners $1 million base salary. Eisners Medicare taxes would be $14,500 -- the same 1.45% of salary as every other worker pays. All told, his bill would be about 2% of that base paycheck. Meanwhile, the average working stiff must give up 6.2% of each dollar earned to Social Security and 1.45% to Medicare, for that 7.65% total. No Social Security tax cuts Whats more, when income tax rates are cut, Mike and I really benefit. (Mike a bit more so than me, but I wont begrudge him.) Social Security and Medicare tax rates, by contrast, have never been trimmed. Since the first payroll tax was collected in 1937, the rates have gone just one way: up.
Source: Social Security Administration Not only havent there been any tax cuts, but there arent any credits, exemptions, deductions or fancy tax shelters to help that guy making minimum wage shield any of his income from payroll taxes. And as hell probably tell you, our minimum-wage worker has no assurance hell get anything back for the money hes putting in. The systems hurtling toward bankruptcy, after all. The Medicare drug benefit is, well, bizarre So, Congress just had to go and make matters worse by adding a drug benefit to Medicare. The idea was good -- lets make sure seniors can afford the drugs they need. But the result was bizarre, to say the least. If you havent already seen it, its a doozy. First, it doesnt become available until 2006. Then, heres how its supposed to work:
Source: Social Security Administration Now, does that make sense to you? Does it make sense to anybody? The only reason to structure the benefit like that was to ensure that as many seniors as possible got a piece of the pie -- whether they needed the helping or not -- while still making the initial cost of the program halfway palatable. And the real costs were off by a third If the goal were to get benefits to the most cash-strapped seniors, the plan would have been means-tested. (That is, as your income increases, the benefit decreases.) If the goal were to prevent catastrophic drug bills from bankrupting older Americans, the deductible could have been higher, and there wouldnt be that ludicrous donut hole in the middle. Reducing the package to cover just those who need the help, though, wouldnt have flown politically. Meanwhile, we learn that the cost of this added benefit wont be a mere $395 billion over the next decade. The White House now says those guesstimates were off by one-third. The real costs now will be $534 billion. I argued in The tax cut taxpayers need most that working families really need a break from Social Security and Medicare taxes. We could give them one by exempting the first $10,000 of income from payroll taxes -- saving each worker $765 a year -- or by reducing the payroll tax rate by a point or two. We could swing such a break only if we get serious about Social Security reforms. But, as the prescription drug benefit shows, theres no political will to do so. The only steps Congress seems to be able to make are giant ones in the wrong direction. Which means, for the folks paying into the system, that theres no relief in sight. Liz Pulliam Weston's column appears every Monday and Thursday, exclusively on MSN Money. She also answers reader questions in the Your Money message board. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.