Dividend stocks for income investors
See Jim's new portfolio to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment.
Jubak's Journal
Recent articles: The oil world's new bullies, 5/2/2006 Is that stock a sell? 5 key tests, 4/28/2006 Oil substitutes? Try these 5 stocks, 4/26/2006 More...
| | Jubak's Journal 3 stocks to ride ethanol's rise
It's no secret ethanol is being hailed as a fuel of the future, or that ethanol stocks are overpriced. Here's a better way to play the trend.
By Jim Jubak
Think about this next time you fill up your car with $3 gas: Everybody is talking about the need for alternative energy, whether it's ethanol from corn or switch grass, solar, wind, nuclear, coal to liquid, or bio-diesel. So why aren't there more alternative energy stocks for an investor to buy?
If you're looking for a pure play on an alternative energy -- whether it's solar or ethanol -- then the pickings are pretty slim. Subtract the overpriced, the over-hyped and the illiquid stocks, and there doesn't seem to be much left.
Let me use the ethanol sector to explain exactly why this is so and to suggest why the best alternative energy stocks to buy aren't the overpriced pure plays but companies that have substantial exposure to new energy alternatives and solid existing businesses. I'll end this column with three ethanol picks -- stocks that I recommended in my regular Wednesday morning appearance on CNBC's Morning Call.
High-priced corn Investing in ethanol ought to be a no-brainer. President Bush brings it up just about every time he talks about a national strategy for reducing the U.S. dependence on oil. The technology works -- and works now. The economics work -- ethanol is cheaper than gasoline. And the raw material -- corn at this stage of the technology -- is in abundant supply.
And it's not that you can't find obvious ethanol plays on the stock market. Ethanol stocks trading at 52-week highs and with plenty of momentum include MGP Ingredients (MGPI, news, msgs), a producer of food-grade and fuel-grade alcohol; and Pacific Ethanol (PEIX, news, msgs), a startup with plans to build five ethanol plants on the West Coast.
It's just that most of these ethanol pure plays are too expensive.
How expensive?
MGP Ingredients, with $300 million in sales in the last 12 months, trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 62. Pacific Ethanol has $88 million in sales in the last 12 months, but with no earnings, the shares don't have a price-to-earnings ratio.
Related news and commentary on MSN Money
In both these cases, I think an investor is paying a premium price to get a hot pure play in a sector where there are relatively few names to buy.
Contrast that pricing with that for a company with a dose of ethanol blended into another business.
Archer Daniels Midland (ADM, news, msgs), the world's largest corn processor, is also the country's largest producer of ethanol, with a 25% market share in the United States. It plans to add a second plant, producing 275 million gallons of ethanol this year.
But that leading position in ethanol is just a small part of Archer Daniels' business. Sales for the company's bio-products group, which includes ethanol sales, were just $105 million for the most recent quarter. That's up 7% for the quarter but represents just 1% of Archer-Daniels' $9.1 billion in sales for the quarter.
The stock has historically traded at a price-to-earnings ratio between 13 and 33, with an average of 17. At the May 2 closing price, investors were paying 25 times trailing 12-month earnings per share. That's above the historical average for the stock but reasonable in the over-heated world of pure-play ethanol valuations because that fast growing business is blended with the company's existing businesses.
Too many ifs I'm emphasizing price because, as exciting as the future of ethanol companies may be, they all face huge uncertainties. Considering those uncertainties, I'm not that keen on paying a high price-to-earnings multiple for these shares today.
Part of the appeal of ethanol depends on the Bush administration's energy policies, and these policies haven't been especially consistent. For example, while promoting ethanol in his speeches, the president has also asked for waivers this summer that would let areas with critical fuel shortages delay their switch to reformulated gasoline with higher ethanol content. Presumably that would reduce ethanol demand and ethanol prices.
While producing ethanol from corn, which Archer-Daniels does, is a proven technology, the long-term direction of ethanol technology is very, very fluid. Ethanol production in the United States is projected to expand to 6.5 billion gallons in 2007 from 3.9 billion gallons in 2005. But beyond 2007, corn-based ethanol will face increasing competition from ethanol made from plant cellulose. According to a study by the Stanford Washington Research Group, production of ethanol from corn will top out at around 14 billion gallons. (Annual U.S. gasoline use is about 140 billion gallons.)
Iogen, a private company and the early name in cellulose-based ethanol thanks to a blue ribbon investor group that includes Goldman Sachs (GD, news, msgs), expects to start producing plant-based ethanol by 2009. Iogen is projecting a cost of 90 cents a gallon when its plants are in full production. Right now it costs about $1.10 to produce a gallon of corn-based ethanol, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Thanks to the lower cost of plant cellulose versus corn, plant-based ethanol could have a permanent cost advantage.
Some of these ethanol companies are still busy raising capital for new plants. Pacific Ethanol, for example, in November 2005 raised $84 million to pay for part of the construction of its five planned ethanol plants in an issue of convertible preferred stock. This kind of capital raising, essential as it is, dilutes the holdings of current shareholders by reducing the percentage of the company they own. And that will make the price-to-earnings ratio even higher -- when the company finally does have some earnings. All this presents a challenge to an investor who, as I do, believes in the future growth and profitability of alternative energy companies, but who doesn't find most of the obvious names very attractive because they're trading at relatively high prices considering the sizeable risks in the sector.
What to do?
Invest in companies that blend exposure to the future of an exciting alternative energy such as ethanol with an existing growth business. Don't go for any blend, however, unless you like the stand-alone prospects for the company's existing business. I made these three blended ethanol picks on CNBC's "Morning Call" on May 3.
Archer Daniels Midland (ADM, news, msgs) crushed Wall Street earnings estimates when it reported earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 of 54 cents a share, way above the consensus projected of 46 cents a share. Although the company's ethanol business did well on rising prices, the real star was the company's oil-seed processing business, where operating profit climbed by 53% thanks to improved sales in Europe and China. The company plans to open a second ethanol plant in 2006, which would add capacity of 275 million gallons. In addition, Archer-Daniels is currently building the first commercial plant (with Metabolix) to produce PHA plastics from plants rather than oil. The stock recently traded at 25 times trailing 12-month earnings per share and 20 times projected fiscal (June) 2007 earnings. Our StockScouter rates these shares a 7 out of a possible 10.
DuPont (DD, news, msgs)'s strongest current business is electronics and communications technologies, where in the first quarter this special chemicals unit saw the highest earnings level in five years, with projections of beating this record in the second quarter of 2006. Future growth should come from a current laggard, the company's Pioneer seed business, which lost market share to Monsanto (MON, news, msgs) in the most recent quarter. If the United States and other countries with substantial agricultural sectors are going to get a big part of their future energy from ethanol and other bio-fuels, the pressure will be on to increase yield per acre. And that plays to Pioneer's strength. In its first quarter guidance, Du Pont lowered projections for the second quarter but raised them for the year, making this a definite second-half-of-2006 stock. The stock recent sold for 22 times 12-month trailing earnings and 15 times projected 2006 earnings. It pays a 3.3% dividend. Our StockScouter rates these shares a 6 out of a possible 10.
Smithfield Foods (SFD, news, msgs) will play a key role in closing the ethanol production loop. What's left after you've turned corn or any other grain into ethanol is a by-product called distillers' dried grains. If ethanol production from corn and other grains takes off, there will sure by a lot of distillers' dried grains left. What to do with it? Feed it to the pigs. Whereas ethanol production may wind up hurting chicken growers as competition for corn drives up its cost, the abundance of ethanol bi-products is likely to be a boon to pork producers since it will serve as an inexpensive alternative to soybean meal. On April 28, Smithfield Foods kept its stock in decline by announcing that a protein glut -- caused when fears of avian flu resulted in a massive decline in chicken exports -- would pretty much wipe out earnings for the quarter that ends in April. Wall Street had expected 50 cents a share. The stock recently traded at 12 times projected fiscal 2007 (June) earnings per share. Our StockScouter rates these shares a 6 out of a possible 10.
Editor's Note: A new Jubaks Journal is posted every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Please note that Jubak's Picks recommendations are for a 12-to-18 month time horizon. See Jubak's CNBC Picks for shorter six month recommendations. For suggestions to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment see Jim's new portfolio Dividend stocks for income investors. For picks with a truly long-term perspective see Jubak's 50 best stocks in the world or Future Fantastic 50 Portfolio.
E-mail Jim Jubak at jjmail@microsoft.com.
At the time of publication, Jim Jubak did not own or control shares in any of the equities mentioned in this column. He doesn't own short positions in any stock mentioned in this column.
|