Robert Walberg

Print-friendly version
Send this to a friend

Posted 4/6/2006


Cool Tools
Get market news by e-mail
See if refinancing works
Personal finance bookshelf
Letters from MSN Money readers
Find It!
Article Index
Fast Answers
Tools Index
Site map
MSN Money








Street Patrol

Recent articles:
• GM's CEO must go, 4/5/2006
• Waiting (even longer) for Vista, 3/22/2006
• It's time to buy a beefed-up Oracle, 3/21/2006
More...



 Street Patrol
The Martha-Macy's marriage: A good thing?

advertisement
Coming soon to Macy's: sheets and plates from Martha Stewart. Here's a look at the new deal's winners and losers.

By Robert Walberg

First Martha Stewart was everywhere -- magazines, TV, satellite radio, prison, etc. Now she's expanding her housewares empire, too.

In a deal applauded by investors and analysts alike, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO, news, msgs) announced that it will roll out an exclusive line of home goods for Macys starting in the fall of 2007. The stock responded to the news by removing its shackles and running up 12%.

So investors again are caught up in Martha-mania. But lets take a closer look at the deal and what it means for all the players involved.

A safety net for Martha
As for Martha Stewart Living, the deal with Macys is positive for three main reasons:

  • It expands the companys reach by offering the Martha Stewart Collection of sheets, dinnerware, towels, etc. to a more upscale clientele.
  • It serves notice to Kmart that it will have to pay up to keep the popular brand in its stores once the current deal with Kmart parent Sears Holdings (SHLD, news, msgs) ends in 2010.
  • It insulates Martha Stewart Living from the diminished payments it is scheduled to receive from Sears in the later years of their contract. Martha Stewart Living is due to receive a guaranteed payment of $59 million this year, regardless of sales. By the final year of the deal, that payment falls to $15 million.

Aligning itself with Macys also protects Martha Stewart Living. While Kmart continues to struggle to win back market share from Wal-Mart (WMT, news, msgs) and Target (TGT, news, msgs), Macys is expanding its reach as parent Federated streamlines its chains and focuses on a few successful brands.


More from MSN Money
Related resources image
Kmart, Sears union is no blue-light special
A red-tag sale at Abercrombie?
The Gap has lost the young and hip
Blue-jean sellers strike a blue-chip pose
All recent news about Martha Stewart

Though the deal announcement focused on branding synergies and not numbers, the deal with Macys should provide a considerable long-term boost to Martha Stewart Livings revenue. Unlike at Kmart, where the Martha Stewart Collection is the top housewares line, Martha Stewart will have much stiffer competition at Macys. But the Martha brand carries enough cache to steal a significant share of Macys nearly $4 billion housewares market -- and thats a nice addition to the Kmart business. Of course, this assumes that the company will continue its relationship with Sears Holdings beyond the current term.

The power of the brand
As for Macys parent Federated (FD, news, msgs), the deal is a no-brainer. Orchestrating an exclusive relationship with an established, popular brand such as Martha Stewart not only gives the company an edge against the competition, but it provides tremendous cross-promotion opportunities. Whether you like Martha Stewart or not, theres no denying the power and scope of the brand.

Not only can Martha Stewart hawk products on her television show, but there are also the magazines and now her satellite radio program on Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI, news, msgs). No doubt the advertising and promotional opportunities created by Martha Stewart Livings multimedia were of great attraction to the folks at Federated.

The loser, if there is one, in todays announcement is Kmarts parent company, Sears. Martha Stewart Living has now shown that it has other options for branding and distributing its merchandise. Consequently, the company will be bargaining from a much stronger position if, and when, it renegotiates terms with Sears.

Until this point, Sears management has been reluctant to expand the scope, or improve the terms, of its deal with Martha Stewart Living. To continue on that path risks losing one of Kmarts strongest attractions -- a fate the struggling chain can ill afford.

While the deal with Macys looks like a winner, that doesnt mean that Martha Stewart's stock will be a winner -- at least not over the intermediate to long-term. It is important to remember that the deal with Macys doesnt kick in until the fall of next year. Martha Stewart Livings valuations are too high, its competition too intense and its reliance on one figure still too great for the stock to be a buy. If you own the stock, consider selling if it moves above $21.

At the time of publication, Robert Walberg did not own or control shares of companies mentioned in this column.
 

More Resources
· E-mail us your comments on this article
· Post on the Your Money message board
· Get a daily dose of market news
advertisement

Sponsored Links

MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.