Jim Jubak

To print article, click Print on your browser's File menu.

Go back


Posted 4/28/2006

Jubak's Picks
Check out Jim's top stocks for the next 12 months


50 Best Stocks Today

See Jim's list of the 50 best stocks in the world for the long term.


Future Fantastic 50 Stocks

See Jim's reader-assisted Future Fantastic 50 portfolio.


Dividend stocks for income investors

See Jim's new portfolio to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment.



Cool Tools
Get market news by e-mail
See if refinancing works
Personal finance bookshelf
Letters from MSN Money readers
Find It!
Article Index
Fast Answers
Tools Index
Site map
MSN Money








Jubak's Journal

Recent articles:
• Oil substitutes? Try these 5 stocks, 4/26/2006
• Energy still the key for income investors, 4/25/2006
• Why interest rates will march higher, 4/21/2006
More...



 Jubak's Journal
Is that stock a sell? 5 key tests

So you're way up on an oil stock or gold play, you're getting nervous and you feel the urge to sell? It's time to do some research. To avoid big mistakes, apply these five tests.

By Jim Jubak

Are you about to sell the wrong stocks? Again?

Admit it. We all make too many of our sell decisions based on the fear that somebody is about to take our gains away. I do it. We all do it.

Despite the time-tested Wall Street advice to sell your losers and let your winners run, investors tend to do just the opposite. We sell stocks with price momentum and with strong and improving fundamentals, just because they've gone up in price. And we hold onto the dogs that no one is buying and where fundamentals are weakening, just because we cling to the hope that we can get even.

A tide of nervousness
And if my e-mail is any guide, some of us are about to do it again. I can sense the nervousness rising. If you were fortunate enough to get in on oil or copper or coal or gold stocks before they really took off, you're looking at huge gains. Peabody Energy (BTU, news, msgs), Goldcorp (GG, news, msgs) and Schlumberger (SLB, news, msgs), for example, are up 187%, 156%, and 101% in the 12 months that ended on April 26. And these are exactly the stocks that you're thinking of selling.
See the news
that affects your stocks.

Check out our
new News center.



The most important bit of investor psychology for our purposes is something called "loss aversion." Research in behavioral finance shows that investors prefer avoiding losses to making gains -- fear of loss is about twice as powerful as hope for gain. So every dollar's appreciation in a stock we own just ratchets up our fears of loss far more powerfully than it increases our hopes of gain. That makes it harder to hold on. (The desire to avoid a loss also shows up in a tendency to take inappropriate risk if it offers the possibility of getting even. That's one reason we hold onto dogs even if there is evidence that a falling stock will fall further.)


Related news and commentary on MSN Money
Related resources image
A Beginners Guide to Investing
Investing 101: Buy your first stock or fund
Investing 102: Pick a stock and buy it
MSN Money's stock research
Start investing with just $100


So, before we pull the trigger on any sell decision that we'll regret down the road (if we're honest enough to face up to it, that is), let's take a deep breath and review one strategy for how to sell. I'm going to use the stocks in Jubak's Picks as my examples, but I think the lessons are applicable to just about anything you own.

How to sell in five easy lessons.
No. 1: Review why you bought the stock in the first place. Has the company delivered the results to support your investment thesis, or are the results you hoped for delayed, perhaps forever? If your investment thesis is broken, the stock is a sell. If the results are merely delayed, look to Lesson No. 5, setting a target price to see if the potential gain justifies the wait.

So for example, I added Grant Prideco (GRP, news, msgs) to Jubak's Picks on Dec. 12, 2005, on this investment thesis:
    "Somebody has got to make the things that go into drilling rigs, and in the markets for premium steel tubing and drilling products, that somebody is often Grant Prideco. (The company controls nearly 50% of the drilling-products market.) The company's order backlog climbed to $742 million at the end of the third quarter -- not bad for a company that did $946 million in sales for all of 2004. As a manufacturer with a high percentage of fixed costs, Grant Prideco should see earnings soar as volumes increase."
The pick looked a little dicey in mid-February when the company reported earnings growth of 140% but projected just 37% to 49% earnings growth for 2006. Shares fell from $51.50 on Feb. 13 to $36.57 on March 9. But I thought my investment thesis remained intact, even if Wall Street didn't agree. The company's backlog of orders continued to build. The company's second-quarter results and upwardly revised guidance for 2006 confirmed that thesis.

If Grant Prideco isn't a sell because my investment thesis isn't broken, Sysco (SYY, news, msgs) increasingly looks to me like it might be. I bought the stock because I thought the company was about to experience improved profit margins. The improvement has been slow to materialize, and I'll be looking to the company's May 1 earnings report to see if my investment thesis is broken and if Sysco is a sell.

No. 2: Has the stock become just too popular? Stocks climb because investors who don't own shares decide to buy shares. (Hey, I've never claimed this stuff is rocket science.) So while you'd like to buy into shares that have been discovered (or are about to be discovered) by enough other investors to start the price moving upward, you'd also like to know that there's a sizeable reserve of investors who don't own the stock now who are likely to buy it in the future. If it looks like everyone who is coming on board is on board, it's time to sell.
There are lots of ways to judge this. From the stock chart you can look for danger signs, such as falling volume on days the stock climbs in price. You can check under Financial Results, Key Ratios (click here and punch in a stock symbol) to see how the stock's price-to-earnings ratio compares to that of the rest of the market. If the stock is already selling at a premium to the market, expanding the multiple that investors are willing to pay for earnings gets harder. And you can check to see how the stock reacts to good news. If the reaction is muted, it suggests that there aren't a lot of investors waiting to jump on board.

That's exactly what worries me about the market reaction to PepsiCo (PEP, news, msgs)'s earnings report on April 26. The company beat the Wall Street consensus on earnings by 2 cents a share and on revenue by 2%. Revenue grew by 9.4% from the first quarter of 2005, and the company looks on track to report another year of 10% to 11% earnings growth. That's a very impressive feat when profit margins are being pressured in industry after industry by rising energy costs. But investors and potential investors weren't impressed. Maybe that's because PepsiCo already trades at 24 times trailing 12-month earnings, and the average for its industry is 21 times. The shares certainly bear watching to see how they behave as the stock, now near $58, approaches its 52-week high at $60.55.

No. 3: Look for specific danger signs. For many investors, insider selling is a big red flag. Now that so many companies have set up automatic timed sales programs for top executives in an effort to avoid shareholder suits if the stock drops just after an insider sells, I suggest looking not just for insider selling but for a surge that's above normal selling patterns.

I also look at the company's chart to see if the stock has gone parabolic. If a stock that has been trending upward at a steady or steep pace suddenly spikes upward toward the stratosphere, there's a good chance that you're looking at an unsustainable gain that will fall back to the former trend line. Depending on the stock, the size of the spike, and the place of the stock in your portfolio, this could be the sign of a good time to sell.

No. 4: Think ahead six months, a year, five years -- whatever time horizon you consider in your strategic planning. Is the stock a critical part of executing that strategy? So for example, I think inflation is moving higher over the next three years, and owning gold is a key part of positioning my strategy for that. Selling because the stocks in the sector are ahead of the fundamentals -- which I think they are -- and then attempting to buy them back requires me to get two timing calls correct. (And I need the market to oblige with a correction back to what I regard as fundamental values.) If I'm working in a taxable account, the sell would also generate a tax event. So because gold is strategically key to my portfolio, my thoughts of selling turn to a conviction to hold.

No. 5: Set a future target price. Is your projected gain enough to make it worth owning this stock going forward? Forget about how far the stock has climbed while you've owned it -- that's all in the past (and you can put it in the bank if you decide to sell.) What you want to know now, you ungrateful thing, is what this stock can do for you tomorrow.

For example, I bought shares of oil-drilling equipment company Ensco International (ESV, news, msgs) for Jubak's Picks on Sept. 23, 2005. The stock has done well by me since then -- it was up 36% as of April 26, 2006 -- and it is within two dollars of my target price of $58 a share by September. In 2005 the company produced record revenue and net income with net income actually tripling from the previous year. On April 25, the company reported first-quarter earnings of 5 cents a share above the Wall Street consensus and revenues of $385 million, $14 million above Wall Street projections and an 83% increase on the first quarter of 2005. So it's certainly reasonable to ask whether the fundamentals behind these shares have peaked. In this case, I think the answer is no. The company put in orders for new jack-up drilling rigs before the current boom in demand for offshore drilling hit its stride. That early start meant that the company saw delivery of new rigs at the end of 2005 and will see rigs delivered in the first half of 2006, which gives Ensco International additional rigs while day rates for rigs are still rising.

And perhaps even more importantly for a cyclical stock such as Ensco International, it's starting to become clear to investors that this cycle still hasn't peaked, and that Ensco will see increased revenue and earnings growth into 2007. Using even the Wall Street consensus earnings-per-share projections for 2006 and a multiple of 14.6, a blend of the price-earnings ratio in 1997-1998, the last revenue peak for Ensco, I get a price target for December 2006 of $70 a share. That's a projected gain of 25% in eight months from today's price, and that's certainly enough to justify holding rather than selling this stock.
Jim Jubak's newsletter
Get the latest from Jim Jubak. Sign up to receive his free weekly newsletter.

Your e-mail address:
 

Learn more about newsletters
 


That's it. Five tests to apply to the stocks you own when you feel the need to sell them. And even when you don't.

No reason to apply these lessons just to your big gainers. These five lessons are a good way to weed the losers out of your portfolio as well.  



Updates
Stocks for the 2006 commodities crunch
Suspicions were back on Feb. 8 when Grant Prideco (GRP, news, msgs) issued earnings guidance for 2006 that management might have been too conservative about growth and that the company would raise estimates for 2006 when it issued first-quarter earnings in April. Those suspicions didn't stop the stock from taking a 14% hit on the disappointing guidance, but they turned out to be dead on when the company reported earnings on April 18. After cutting 2006 earnings guidance in February to $2.40 to $2.60 a share, the company raised its projections for 2006 in April to $2.75 to $2.85 a share. The company's backlog of orders continued to climb, too -- to $1 billion from $814 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. Considering the company did only $1.35 billion in revenue for all of 2005, that backlog is a very solid guarantee that Grant Prideco hasn't yet seen its business peak. As of April 28 I'm raising my target price to $63 a share by December 2006 from the previous target of $54. (Full disclosure: I own shares of Grant Prideco in my personal portfolio.)

How the Fed lost the inflation fight
I added Ensco International (ESV, news, msgs) to Jubak's Picks on Sept. 23 as a hurricane play, pure and simple. "Drilling rigs were in short supply before the big storms hit the Gulf of Mexico; they're in even shorter supply now," I wrote then. "And short supply means higher day-rates for drilling companies that have rigs to hire." Well, the hurricanes are long behind us but day rates for offshore drilling rigs are still climbing. Day rates, according to Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, are projected to climb 65% in 2006 over 2005, and another 26% in 2007 over 2006. And this offshore drilling company is very well placed to get more than its share of that boom in rates. Because of a building program the company began before the current rig shortage developed, Ensco International has one of the youngest jack-up drilling rig fleets at an average age of six years versus the industry average of 20 years. That's money in the bank since newer rigs with newer technology command higher prices. In addition, Ensco International is one of the few offshore rig companies set to receive a supply of new rigs. Of two delivered at the end of 2005, one is already at work and both are under contract. A third rig is set for delivery this year. On April 25 the company reported first-quarter earnings of 5 cents a share above the Wall Street consensus and revenues of $385 million, which is $14 million above Wall Street projections and an 83% increase on the first quarter of 2005. Wall Street currently projects 2006 earnings growth of 160%. As of April 28 I'm raising my target price to $70 a share by December 2006 from my previous target of $56 by September 2006. (Full disclosure: I own shares or ENSCO International in my personal portfolio.)

New developments on past columns
Bad for GM, bad for America
It's not big money but still it's hardly a vote of confidence in the future of General Motors (GM, news, msgs). Nor does it bode well for the companys critical negotiations with Delphi (DPHIQ, news, msgs), a much larger parts supplier. Japan's Yorozu Automotive, the sole supplier of suspensions for several GM models, has threatened to halt shipments if General Motors does not pay $4 million in disrupted bills. GM's attempt to unilaterally cut the prices it pays Yorozu--a charge Delphi has also raised in its negotiations with GM--triggered the dispute. Yorozu has also demanded that General Motors provide a irrevocable letter of credit from a major bank for three times Yorozu's average monthly receivables. Some of this is undoubtedly the normal scramble for position that's part of a legal filing. But it's still a disheartening preview of how testy things could get between GM and Delphi.

Editor's Note: A new Jubaks Journal is posted every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Please note that Jubak's Picks recommendations are for a 12-to-18 month time horizon. See Jubak's CNBC Picks for shorter six month recommendations. For suggestions to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment see Jim's new portfolio Dividend stocks for income investors. For picks with a truly long-term perspective see Jubak's 50 best stocks in the world or Future Fantastic 50 Portfolio.

E-mail Jim Jubak at jjmail@microsoft.com.

At the time of publication, Jim Jubak owned or controlled shares of the following equities mentioned in this column: Ensco International, Goldcorp, Grant Prideco and PepsiCo. He does not own short positions in any stock mentioned in this column.

 

MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.