See Jim's new portfolio to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment.
Jubak's Journal Recent articles: • The U.S. -- not Japan -- is the place to invest, 12/9/2005 • 5 ways to tap into onshore drilling boom, 12/7/2005 • 5 more ways to invest for income, 12/6/2005 More... | Jubak's Journal 5 big 'ifs' investors face in 2006 We really won't know if the new year will be a happy one until summer hits and some of these big questions are put to rest. By Jim Jubak For investors, 2006 will start a little late this year -- about six months late, in fact. Oh, sure, we'll flip open a new calendar on Jan. 1. But as common as it is to think that a new investing year starts with the new year, it's especially important to resist that way of thinking as we head into 2006. Truth is, the big make-or-break events of 2006 -- the ones that will determine how different investing in 2006 is from investing in 2005 -- aren't scheduled to hit the calendar until later in the year. It won't be until July or so that investors will be able turn to each other and extend a New Year's greeting. Whether that greeting will be "Happy New Year" or something much less cheerful depends on how what I call my Five Big Ifs for 2006 play out.
If No. 1: Is the Fed overdoing its increases? If the Federal Reserve has overdone it with the series of interest-rate increases that began on June 30, 2004, economic growth will be slower than expected -- or desired. The interest-rate hikes that began when short-term rates were just 1% are now widely expected to end in 2006 with either the Jan. 31 or March 28 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee. Short-term rates, according to this scenario, will top out at 4.5% or 4.75%. The optimists among investors and economists believe that, at that level, rates will be just right -- high enough to fend off inflation and yet not high enough to stall the economy. Related news and commentary on MSN Money
One group of pessimists says that the Federal Reserve is raising rates too high for an economy that has derived much of its juice in this recovery from a massive increase in consumer debt and a big bump in housing prices. Take away those stimuli by making it discouragingly expensive to borrow, and the economy will slow down faster than anyone now expects. Other pessimists say the Federal Reserve has moved too late and is too complacent. Inflation is back, they argue, and the Fed should pull its head out of the sand. We should know what the Fed has wrought by July at the earliest, or September at the latest, because it takes about six months for the effects of a Fed rate move to ripple out through the economy. A slowdown in economic growth would be bad for the stock market, but it could produce a bond-market rally. A trend toward higher inflation would likely tank both markets. If No. 2: Will gasoline prices shoot up again? If gasoline prices spike upward again, consumers will go back into a deep funk and cut back on purchases. Remember how depressed consumer sentiment was this fall when gas passed $3 a gallon? It's not exactly a coincidence that as gas prices peaked in September and October, consumer sentiment in the University of Michigan survey fell to a 13-year low at 74.2 in October. Gasoline prices have backed off. The national average for a gallon of unleaded, according to AAA (what used to be called the American Automobile Association), stands at $2.14, way, way down from the record high for the national average of $3.06 set on Sept. 5, 2005. Consumer sentiment, meanwhile, has recovered to hit 88.7 in December. The next critical test for the energy-supply system -- everything from tankers to terminals to refineries -- will come next year when the oil industry starts to rev up for the peak driving season. If gas starts to climb back toward and beyond $3 a gallon, investors can expect another outbreak of consumer depression -- and endless news coverage about how low-income consumers will stop shopping at Wal-Mart Stores If we sail through the summer driving season relatively unscathed, it will be a huge boost to consumer -- and investor -- confidence. Lots and lots of folks will draw the probably erroneous conclusion that there really is no energy-supply squeeze. The crisis of 2005 will get filed away as bad luck. (After all, we can't have 26 named hurricanes every year, can we? Predictions for 2006 call for a drop to 17 named storms, a reassuring number unless you know that 10 is the annual average.) If No. 3: Growth in Europe and Japan? If economic growth picks up in the European Union and in Japan, it will take pressure off the U.S. trade deficit. Right now, that's the prediction. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) sees real GDP growth (that's growth after subtracting the rate of inflation) dropping to a still very healthy 3.5% a year in the United States next year, with growth holding solidly positive at 2% in Japan (and accelerating as the year goes along) and at 2.1% in the euro zone. That would be good news for profits and jobs at U.S. blue-chip companies, a sector dominated by big multinational exporters. If anything is to go wrong with these economic projections, investors will know by the time June quarterly numbers are reported. The OECD's forecasts show growth rising from the first quarter of 2006 to an annual peak in the second quarter in Japan. In Europe, growth will continue to accelerate to reach a third-quarter high at 2.2%, the OECD predicts. If instead of accelerating, these two global economies slip back in 2006, the disappointment among investors will take hold with those second-quarter numbers. If No. 4: Growth in China and India? If growth picks up as expected in the developed world and comes in stronger than expected in China and India, investors can expect a resumption of runaway commodity prices. Right now, the forecasts call for economic growth in both countries to slow in 2006 from 2005. The International Monetary Fund and the Asian Development Bank both peg growth at 8.5% in China in 2006, down from 9.2% in 2005, and at 6.8% in India for 2006, down from 7.1% in 2005. That kind of modestly decelerating growth would be good news for companies competing with China and India for supplies of iron, copper, coal, oil and nickel. But, once again, investors are looking at forecasts that project the best of possible worlds: Good growth but not too much growth. The likelihood of faster growth (Europe and Japan are both supposed to show stronger economies in 2006, and that would suck up more exports from China and India) is about balanced with that of a slowdown (higher oil prices could cut growth in these energy-dependent but energy-inefficient manufacturing economies). As with projections for the developed world, investors won't know if 2006 will be disappointingly different from projections until well into the year. If No. 5: Whither speculators? If something zigs when speculators (who dominate so many equity and debt trades right now) expect it to zag, we could get a spectacular blow-up in 2006. A number of bad trends all look like they are headed toward convergence with the end of the Fed's rate hikes and the beginning of a new fiscal year in Japan in March. (For more on the strong dollar and the weak yen -- and the chances for a reversal of that trend -- see my Dec. 9 column, "The U.S. -- not Japan -- is the place to invest.") We're at that point in the credit cycle when low loan-default rates have prompted lenders to cut back on credit checks on their borrowers and pump up earnings by slashing reserves for bad debt. Premiums for taking risk have fallen so that investors don't get much in the way of extra yield if they buy junk instead of U.S. Treasurys. But because there's so much money sloshing around the global financial markets, instead of cutting the appetite for risk, low risk premiums have encouraged yield-hungry investors to buy even riskier vehicles -- such as bundles of interest-only, no-income-verification mortgages. The risks of something going wrong will rise as we move into 2006. The Federal Reserve's last rate hikes will squeeze some debtors and change the patterns of cash flow in many debt instruments as borrowers pay back either more or less than expected. At the same time, the nearing end to the Fed's moves will be an opportunity for traders to put big bets on the direction of rates. The strength of the dollar against the yen and the euro -- and the conviction that that strength can't last -- will also occasion huge macroeconomic bets by traders. Any misstep could be magnified into a systemic problem by a market for credit derivatives that has grown so fast that at any one moment, no one is quite sure what anyone else owns. Sounds like a great howdy-do to a new Federal Reserve chairman. Go with the trend Identifying the potential developing trends for the year ahead lays the foundation for picking stocks. By going through this effort, you can see which way the winds might be blowing and when any storm might kick up. And that's an essential step for any investor who wants to follow my rule of never spitting into the wind. It's a whole lot easier to make money in the stock market if you aren't constantly betting on trends that are possible but unlikely. The trend is your friend. Go with it. But putting together a list of trends and a timetable still leaves you a couple of cards short of a deck when it comes to building an actual investment portfolio. In my next column, I'll take a stab at setting out some sectors -- and maybe even pick a stock or two -- that will let you take advantage of 2006. Whenever it really arrives. New developments on past columns 5 reasons the Fed will fumble in 2006: It's just one point in a notoriously unreliable data series. But, hey, all trends start with a single data point, so I'm not ignoring it, either. Consumer credit -- the amount that U.S. consumers borrow each month -- fell by the biggest amount on record in October, according to the Federal Reserve. Consumer credit fell by a seasonally adjusted $7.2 billion in the month to bring total consumer debt in the United States down to just $2.157 trillion. The October drop came as Wall Street was expecting a $5.2 billion increase for the month. The largest share of the drop came from a $5.6 billion decrease, the biggest on record, in what is called nonrevolving credit for such things as cars, motor homes and education. (It's called nonrevolving because unlike a credit card, which counts as revolving credit, if you pay off part of your auto loan, say, in one month, you can't borrow the paid up amount to buy something else next month.) Revolving credit, such as credit cards, fell by $1.6 billion. I don't think investors should make too much of this number. Part of the drop in auto loans is a result of a drop in U.S. auto sales that resulted when higher cash incentives in the summer months and September stole sales from October. Nonetheless, the drop this October is in stark contrast to the 5.5% increase in consumer credit in the quarter that ended in September 2005. Worth watching. Editor's Note: A new Jubaks Journal is posted every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Please note that Jubak's Picks recommendations are for a 12-to-18 month time horizon. See Jubak's CNBC Picks for shorter six month recommendations. For suggestions to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment see Jim's new portfolio Dividend stocks for income investors. For picks with a truly long-term perspective see Jubak's 50 best stocks in the world or Future Fantastic 50 Portfolio. E-mail Jim Jubak at jjmail@microsoft.com. At the time of publication, Jim Jubak did not own or control shares of any of the equities mentioned in this column. He does not own short positions in any stock mentioned in this column. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.