Jubak's Journal
Recent articles: Do-nothing Fed is dangerously disengaged, 9/9/2005 5 water infrastructure bets, 9/7/2005 Save your portfolio from Katrina and the Fed, 9/6/2005 More...
| | Jubak's Journal Buy gourmet stocks at fast-food prices
A big harvest last year, a drought this year and a killer hurricane make crop prices impossible to forecast. Some first-class companies will get it wrong and get clobbered.
By Jim Jubak
Answer me this: Should the price of corn, soybeans and wheat be up or down in the wake of Katrina?
Don't know? Well, neither do food companies. Even the best food companies.
All I can tell you right now is that crop prices will be volatile. Some very good companies are going to get it wrong and wind up taking a big hit to short-term earnings. Among the casualties will be companies with sterling records of delivering above-average returns to investors for a decade or more. I'd expect that the shares of some of these great long-term investments will get crushed when investors punish them for failing to predict the unpredictable.
That spells an opportunity for investors willing to look past the short-term bad news to buy shares of some of the safest and highest return stocks on the U.S. markets.
All you have to do is follow my "Wait-until-they-get-clobbered, then-buy" strategy.
Against the grains Want to know how tough it is for food company CEOs right now? Just look at how tricky the market has been for the big three grain commodities.
It was tough enough to predict grain prices before Katrina. Drought in the Midwest, the worst in 17 years, was expected to cut the U.S. corn harvest by 12% this year and soybean production by 11%.
Despite those shortfalls, grain prices looked to be lower this year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture was on Aug. 15 projecting $2 a bushel for corn, 3.4% below the $2.07 a bushel average for the 2004 crop. How come? The record corn and soybean harvests of 2004 had left grain silos bulging. With so much grain in storage already, farmers were likely to get less for their 2005 crops.
Katrina has made getting it right even harder. Hurricane Katrina ripped apart the system that sent crops south along the Mississippi on barges for storage or export from New Orleans. No one knows how, or when, the grain harvest that begins this month will get to market.
Related news and commentary on MSN Money
With a smaller 2005 crop and chaos in the shipping system, you would expect grain prices to up, right?
Dead wrong, at least for now. With the first corn, soybeans and wheat just now being harvested in the southernmost states of the U.S. grain belt, such as Arkansas, prices for corn delivered now have tumbled to $1.65 a bushel. That's a huge 17.5% below the $2 a bushel that the U.S. Department of Agriculture was projecting for corn on Aug. 15. And that projection was already 3.4% below the $2.07-a-bushel average for the 2004 crop.
That actually makes sense. Katrina knocked out so much grain storage capacity and made it just about impossible to get grain out of the port of New Orleans. Many grain storage facilities were still bursting with last year's record harvest. That means farmers don't have many buyers, but they don't have any place to store their crops.
Navigating the corn-price maze So, right now the grain markets are assuming that farmers who bring crops to market in the near future will be forced to sell for whatever price they can get. The same commodity market is also telling farmers that if they can find some way to deliver corn in January, instead of now, they'll get a better price. On Sept. 8, grain elevators in Iowa that were paying $1.65 for corn delivered immediately were offering to pay $1.88 a bushel for corn delivered in January.
Imagine that you're the CEO of a company like Corn Products International (CPO, news, msgs), trying to navigate this period of uncertainty. You've locked in the costs of the corn you use to make high fructose corn syrup and corn starch through the end of 2005. Way back in the winter that seemed like the right thing to do, since higher corn prices in 2004 had killed profit margins.
But now? Would you have been better off going unhedged and getting the benefit of current low prices? That kind of second-guessing is enough to keep you up at night. But you've got other worries too. Corn prices may be down, but will kinks in the grain transportation system mean that you won't have enough corn to process when you need it? And then, how about getting that corn syrup and starch to international markets in Mexico and South America? Will the low price of corn translate into low prices for the corn byproducts of your company's syrup- and starch-making processes?
That's a lot of moving parts. The likelihood is extremely high that something will zig when the company had projected it to zag. Wall Street's expectations for Corn Products International are equally high: 26% earnings growth in the third quarter of 2005 from the third quarter of 2004 and 123% earnings growth in this year's fourth quarter. The stock is a good example of what can happen when a company's management gets commodity prices wrong. The stock was crushed in April, dropping from a high of $30.25 to $20.98 when higher-than-expected corn prices led to lower-than-projected margins. Corn Products would be perfect for my "Wait-until-they-get-clobbered, then-buy" strategy, except for two very, very minor details. First, it was already crushed earlier in 2005 when it got the direction of commodity prices wrong, and second, I already own it in Jubak's Picks. (So I've already had the pleasure of being on the wrong side of a market "crush.")
Wait for the carnage Better candidates for this strategy are stocks that
1) haven't been crushed yet 2) tend to sell for high multiples that put me off buying them 3) never seem to go down, despite my reservations about their high valuations. Stocks in this group have delivered returns way, way above the market average year in and year out for very long stretches of time.
If any of these stumble because the company didn't manage to perfectly navigate the uncertainties of the post-Katrina agricultural commodities market, snap it up.
My top five "Wait-until-they-get-clobbered, then-buy" candidates:
Sysco (SYY, news, msgs), the dominant food distributor in the country and a stock that has delivered an average 18.3% annual return over the last 10 years. The only time Sysco shares get in trouble is when the company has trouble passing higher costs on to customers. Since there's an inevitable lag between the rising costs Sysco pays for food and the prices it charges customers, the stock might take a drubbing in the post-Katrina agricultural turmoil. The stock is a reasonable buy anywhere below $30. The company is scheduled to report earnings Nov. 14.
Smithfield Foods (SFD, news, msgs), the country's dominant pork producer, also has big stakes in beef and chicken production, so this company is highly leveraged to the price of corn. Smithfield Foods has turned in an average annual return of 17.5% over the last 10 years. I'd call the shares a steal at $24 or lower. Smithfield Foods is scheduled to report earnings Nov. 24.
Whole Foods Market (WFMI, news, msgs) hasn't been cheap for a long while -- and I don't really expect it to get cheap now, either. But it might get cheaper in the post-Katrina turmoil. The country's dominant whole, natural and/or organic grocery chain has returned an average of 35.9% annually over the last 10 years. If the stock should fall to $107 or lower, I'd suck up my reservations on valuation and buy. The company is scheduled to report earnings Oct. 27.
United Natural Foods (UNFI, news, msgs) doesn't have the track record of either a Sysco or a Whole Foods, since the stock has only a five-year history. But those five years have been pretty good to this company, which combines the food distribution business of a Sysco with the natural foods niche of a Whole Foods. United Natural Foods has returned an average 35.9% annually over the last five years. I'd be a buyer below $30. United Natural Foods is scheduled to report earnings Nov. 30.
PepsiCo (PEP, news, msgs) probably wouldn't miss its earnings target by a lot if it did miss due to higher costs for corn or sugar after Katrina. But I'd take any opportunity to buy shares of what will be, in my opinion, one of the safest and most consistent consumer growth companies for the next five years or more. For the last 10 years, PepsiCo shows an average annual return of 11.8%. The stock has shown weakness in recent quarters on higher raw-materials costs, so a dip isn't out of the question. I like the stock at current prices but I'd be an even more enthusiastic buyer at $50 or lower. PepsiCo will be one of the first companies to report post-Katrina earnings, on Sept. 29. Bad news is never something I look forward to. (And in this case, even less than usual, because I already own Whole Foods Markets and PepsiCo.) But if volatility is what investors can expect in the aftermath of Katrina, the least we can do is be prepared for it.
Updates Sell Danone Group With the French government taking a hard line on foreign acquisitions of key French companies -- what the government has called the country's crown jewels -- I think it's time to take my profits in Danone Group (DA, news, msgs). The stock's run-up since I added it to Jubak's Picks on June 10 -- shares have already hit my December 2005 target -- has made the stock fairly valued on fundamentals, I believe. And the likelihood that the French government would block any bid from a foreign acquirer eliminates any appreciable buy-out premium. I'm selling Danone Group with a 27% gain.
New developments on past columns
From Russia with love: $60 oil Shortages of oil, oil-supply disruptions, soaring prices of oil and natural gas -- all work to the advantage of coal companies such as Peabody Energy (BTU, news, msgs). So, as of Sept. 13, I'm raising my target on Peabody to $76 a share by October 2005. That said, I'd also note that the shares are approaching fair value on their fundamentals. So I'm setting a fairly tight stop-loss of $68 a share. One reason I'm letting the shares ride is Peabody Energy's second-quarter earnings: The company reported earnings of 71 cents a share, solidly ahead of the Wall Street consensus of 68 cents. But that led Wall Street analysts to up their earnings forecasts for 2005 to an average of $3.01, near the top of the company's own guidance of earnings of $2.50 to $3.10 for 2005. That raises the risk that the company could disappoint, even if it meets its own guidance, and it raises the risk in the stock. Hence my tight stop-loss.
Editor's Note: A new Jubaks Journal is posted every Tuesday and Friday.
E-mail Jim Jubak at jjmail@microsoft.com.
At the time of publication, Jim Jubak owned or controlled shares in the following equities mentioned in this column: Corn Products International and Whole Foods Markets. He doesn't own short positions in any stock mentioned in this column.
|