Related Articles
A portfolio built for gloom, but not doom
Related Resources
Stock Research
Jubak's Journal
Recent articles:
• A portfolio built for gloom, but not doom, 3/18/2005
• 5 stocks for the energy and metals boom, 3/16/2005
• Whom to believe -- Buffett or Greenspan?, 3/15/2005
More...
| | Jubak's Journal
Why the market will dodge a dollar disaster
Things may look bad for the U.S. economy, but things are worse overseas. This means the euro and the yen won't replace the greenback just yet.
By Jim Jubak
First the bad news: The U.S. trade deficit hit a record $666 billion in 2004, and the euro is up 47% against the dollar since May 2002. The dollars decline means slower economic growth, higher interest rates, a stagnant stock market and a slippage in the U.S. standard of living. All of which is enough to make me a pessimist.
Now the good news: The dollar isn't going to crash, and those market pundits urging you to short everything except gold and silver are wrong.
I don't buy the extreme scenarios because they underestimate the feedback mechanisms in capitalist economies that kick in when a trend swings too far in one direction or the other. In the current case, these mechanisms will help limit the damage to the dollar -- and to the U.S. and global economies.
Better off than Europe, Japan?
And what are these mysterious mechanisms? Nothing more complicated than this: You think we've got problems now -- just wait until the global financial markets latch onto the even bigger mess that the Europeans and the Japanese face. Sure, you may not want to own U.S. dollars because of trade and budget deficits, our aging population and the huge financial obligations they impose, not to mention our inability to agree on meaningful fixes for anything. But, hey, do you really want to own a lot more euros and yen when everything is so much worse in those economies?
Lets do a comparison of the dollar and its main global competitors, the euro and the yen, on the crucial points.- Government budget deficits. Ours is huge: $412 billion in fiscal 2004. That came to 4.4% of gross domestic product, one measure of the size of the U.S. economy. In France, the budget deficit in 2004 was 3.7% of GDP and in Germany, 3.9%, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Better but not hugely better. If you prefer euros to dollars, though, what's important to you is the projected trend in future deficits. According to the OECD, the budget deficit will drop to 2.9% of GDP in France in 2006 and to 2.2% in Germany. But it will stay almost steady at 4.2% in the United States. Score a point for the euro -- but definitely score one or more against the yen. Japan ran a government budget deficit of 6.5% of GDP in 2004, and the OECD is projecting the deficit will drop just a smidge to 6.3% in 2006.
- Economic growth. We all feel that the budget deficit is out of control in the United States, so why doesn't the comparison with Europe (let alone Japan) look worse? Growth. Economic growth in the United States is significantly higher than in the rest of the developed world -- and faster economic growth covers a multitude of financial sins. Again using OECD projections, the U.S. economy will grow by 3.3% in 2005 and 3.6% in 2006 (in real terms, that is, after subtracting inflation). The French economy will grow by just 2% in 2005 and 2.3% in 2006. Germany will struggle with even slower growth of 1.4% in 2005 and 2.3% in 2006. For the euro zone as a whole, growth will come in at 1.9% in 2005 and 2.5% in 2006. Japan, the home of the yen, is projected to show economic growth of just 2.1% in 2005 and 2.3% in 2006.
- Demographic burdens. In the United States, we've got a Social Security crisis, to use President Bush's word, because the ratio of workers paying into Social Security to the retirees receiving benefits has fallen to 3.4 workers to one retiree in 2000, from 16.5 workers to one retiree in 1950. And it's headed to a 2-1 ratio by 2030. Paying for the pensions and health care of those retirees when the number of workers is shrinking is enough to bust any budget. Well, then, think how much worse the financial squeeze is in countries where the population is aging more quickly than it is here. In the euro-zone countries right now, there are 35 people of retirement age to every 100 of working age, according to the United Nations. (In the United States, the ratio is about 15 to 100, by my calculations.) By 2050, the ratio in euro-land will be 75 people of pension age to every 100 workers, and in countries like Italy and Spain, the ratio will be close to 1 to 1. German workers already pay almost 30% of their wages into the state pension plan. In Europe those demographics will, I think, make the OECD forecasts of falling budget deficits wildly optimistic because theyre founded on the assumption that European governments will be able to get the huge pension liabilities for their huge force of government workers under control. In Japan, where the population is aging even faster, the budget problem is even worse. Fully one-third of Japan's population will be 60 years or older within a decade, according to Phillip Longman's book "The Empty Cradle."
A floor for the dollar
OK, so let's sum up. The United States is faced with a huge budget deficit that makes foreign investors nervous about holding dollars. But as a percentage of GDP, that deficit isn't that much worse than those in Europe and better than the one in Japan, the homes of the two major competing global currencies. In addition, the U.S. economy is growing faster than those of Europe and Japan, and our budget-busting demographic burden isnt as serious as those faced by the Europeans and the Japanese.
Related news and commentary on MSN Money
To me, this situation puts a limit on how far the dollar will fall against the euro and the yen, the two other major international trading and investing currencies. The current decline of the dollar against those currencies comes as foreign central banks decide to diversify their holdings of foreign exchange. For a central bank like the Bank of Korea, for example, that means reducing the current 60% to 65% of the bank's $210 billion in foreign-exchange reserves now in dollars by adding investments in euros, yen and a few other currencies. Globally, the U.S. dollar made up 64% of central bank reserves at the end of 2003.
If foreign central banks stopped buying dollars entirely, Wall Street estimates, the dollar would have to drop another 30% and U.S. bond yields would have to climb by 4.5 percentage points to attract enough private capital to fill the gap.
That's a worst-case scenario, and you'll note that it's still well short of the end of the world. And because you can't just sell a dollar without buying some other currency, the weaknesses in the yen and euro economies mean that the move away from dollars will stop well short of that. For example, even today, the yen makes up only 5% of central-bank reserves because Japanese government bonds yield almost nothing and because the attractiveness of the yen is dampened, shall we say, for anyone who understands Japan's impending budget meltdown. The same with the euro, where euro-denominated bonds yield less than U.S. Treasurys, making diversification out of dollars and into euros prudent in the long run but painful in the short run. Closing that dollar/euro yield gap doesn't seem to be in the cards, either, because raising interest rates in Europe would slow those slow-growing economies even more.
Asian banks' message to the Fed: Raise rates
In fact, you can see all the talk about diversification from Asian central banks as just a signal to the U.S. Federal Reserve. The message? If you want us to keep holding dollars, keep raising U.S. interest rates so that holding dollars will produce more income for the world's creditor banks.
And as my comparison of the economies and budgets of the dollar, euro and yen economies should tell you, the United States, thanks to its faster economic growth rate, has more room to raise interest rates -- without producing a recession -- than the economies of its currency competitors.
So, yes, the U.S. dollar is headed lower, U.S. interest rates are headed higher and U.S. economic growth won't be as fast as now projected, but all this decline will stop well short of the dollar disaster that might produce a domestic or global financial meltdown all because the economies of Europe and Japan are in even worse shape than ours is.
Now, doesn't that make you feel better?
New developments on past columns
A portfolio for gloom, not doom
If someone -- say, the U.S. Senate -- does something really stupid, all bets are off and maybe we should run for the hills. And stupid is a pretty good description of what the Senate did on March 17. First, the senators stripped out savings of $32 billion over five years from the proposed Senate budget. The savings, already $19 billion less than President Bush had proposed, would have come from reductions in entitlement programs including Medicaid. Whether you call those cuts fiscal responsibility or balancing the budget on the backs of the poor, the Senate's next act has to leave investors of any political persuasion in despair. For its second act, the Senate added $5.4 billion to the budget for education and then added a new $64 billion in tax cuts. Credit, if that's the term, goes to Sens. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and Jim Bunning, R-Ky, respectively. Bunning's $64 billion in tax cuts comes on top of $71 billion in tax cuts already in the proposed budget.
Editor's Note: A new Jubaks Journal is posted every Tuesday and Friday.
E-mail Jim Jubak at jjmail@microsoft.com.
At the time of publication, Jim Jubak did not own or control shares in any of the equities mentioned in this column. He does not own short positions in any stock mentioned in this column.
|
